Republic Pictures Corp. v. Kappler
Republic Pictures Corp. v. Kappler, 327 U.S. 757 (1946)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. McKnett v. St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co., 292 U. S. 230,233,234 ; Pufahl v. Estate of Parks, 299 U. S. 217, 227 ; Miles v. Illinois Central R. Co., 315 U. S. 698, 704 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(state statute of limitations expressly covering claims founded on Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is unconstitutional)
Cited by 29 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Callaghan v. Coberly
- Trustees of Wyoming Laborers Health and Welfare Plan v. Morgen & Oswood Construction Company, Inc. of Wyoming
- Stanley L. Hughes v. Sheriff of Fall River County Jail and Jeff Tarell, Jailer Fall River County Jail
- Matthewman v. Akahane
- Edgar Pauk v. The Board of Trustees of the City University of New York
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. GILBARCO, INC.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.