Boeing Aircraft Co. v. King County
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
In No. 1027, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied. In No. 1028, the appeal is dismissed for the reason that application therefor was not made within the time provided by law. § 8 (a), Act of February 13, 1925 ( 43 Stat. 936 , 940), 28 U. S. C. § 350 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- Federal District Courts1
- Federal Specialty Courts1
- State Highest Courts4
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Attorney General Opinions1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.