TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bellaskus v. Crossman

Bellaskus v. Crossman, Officer in Charge, U. S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Bellaskus v. Crossman, 335 U.S. 840 (1948)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 18, 1948
Docket
No. 10
Citations
335 U.S. 84069 S. Ct. 6493 L. Ed. 3911948 U.S. LEXIS 1670

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

Upon suggestion of the Solicitor General and consideration of the record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its order discharging the rule to show cause and dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman and Robert S. Erdahl.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1948: 11952: 21953: 11954: 11958: 11963: 31967: 21972: 11973: 11981: 119482026peak 1963 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lee Wei Fang v. Robert F317 F.2d 180 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
  2. Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981)
  3. United States v. Frank Costello255 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1958)
  4. Earl R. Cephus v. United States324 F.2d 893 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
  5. United States v. Puff211 F.2d 171 (2d Cir. 1954)
  6. Casey v. United States343 U.S. 808 (1952)

Most recent

  1. Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981)
  2. United States v. Corbitt368 F. Supp. 881 (E.D. Pa. 1973)
  3. United States v. James Carlton456 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1972)
  4. Cosgrove v. County of Sacramento252 Cal. App. 2d 45 (1967)
  5. Dickson v. United States226 A.2d 364 (D.C. 1967)
  6. Earl R. Cephus v. United States324 F.2d 893 (D.C. Cir. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list