TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Anderegg v. United States

Anderegg v. United States, 336 U.S. 967 (1949)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 2, 1949
Docket
No. 605
Citations
336 U.S. 96769 S. Ct. 93793 L. Ed. 11181949 U.S. LEXIS 2467

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 45 cases

View all citing references →
1950: 11954: 11955: 21956: 51957: 11958: 21959: 31960: 21961: 21962: 31963: 31964: 11965: 11966: 21968: 11970: 11971: 11972: 11975: 11977: 11978: 21983: 41984: 11993: 11997: 12023: 119502026peak 1956 · 5

Most recent

  1. Okutsu v. State.528 P.3d 956 (Haw. App. 2023)
  2. Addamax Corp. v. Open Software Foundation, Inc.964 F. Supp. 549 (D. Mass. 1997)
  3. Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc.5 F.3d 1557 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
  4. Bevelheimer v. United States4 Cl. Ct. 558 (Ct. Cl. 1984)
  5. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983)
  6. Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc., Litton Business Systems, Inc., and Litton Industries Credit Corporation - Cross v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company, Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., New York Telephone Company, Inc., New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company -Cross Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list