Walker v. Ragen
Walker v. Ragen, Warden Boscio v. Ragen, Warden Villasenor v. Ragen, Warden Rohde v. Illinois Murphy v. Ragen, Warden Cox v. Illinois Ferguson v. Ragen, Warden
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois;
Circuit Court of Winnebago County, Illinois;
Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois;
Supreme Court of Illinois (reported below: 403 Ill. 41 , 85 N. E. 2d 24 );
Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois;
Circuit Court of Randolph County, Illinois; and
Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois. The petition for writ of certiorari in each of these cases is denied without consideration of the questions raised therein and without prejudice to the institution by petitioner of proceedings in any Illinois state court of competent jurisdiction under the Act of August 4, 1949, entitled: “An Act to provide a remedy for persons convicted and imprisoned in the penitentiary, who assert that rights guaranteed to them by the Constitution of the United States or the State of Illinois, or both, have been denied or violated, in proceedings in which they were convicted.” Laws of Illinois, 1949, p. 722.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 16 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court2
- U.S. Courts of Appeals8
- Federal District Courts3
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Michael C. Seepe, Private, United States Marine Corps v. Department of the Navy
- People v. Mamolella
- People v. Valentine
- Fred Dabney v. Maurice H. Sigler, Warden of the Nebraska State Penitentiary, Lincoln, Nebraska
- United States of America ex rel. Thomas Kling v. J. E. Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York
- Glen T. MacOmber v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.