McLean v. State
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Brannon, Judge:
James McLean filed a petition in the county court of Jackson county complaining' that the commissioner for reassessment of lands acting under the reassessment act, chapter 15, Acts of 1904, had charged to him oil and gas reservations in 1727 acres of land at one dollar per acre, and averring such reservations possessed no actual value, and that such charge was erroneous, and praying that such assessment be released and stricken from the land book. Upon hearing the county court refused ,to release such assessment. On appeal to the circuit court taken by McLean the circuit court held that the assessment of such oil and gas reservations was erroneous for the reason that the same were not shown by the evidence to have any true and actual value for taxation, and ordered the charge to be stricken from the tax book. The State sued out a writ of error from this Court."
Has this Court jurisdiction of this writ of error? It is a *538 fixed rule that unless a statute, pursuant to the constitution, grants a writ of error in the case, none can be entertained in this Court. State v. Shumate, 48 W. Va. 360 ; Carskadon v. Board, (decided March 1907.) Chapter 15, Acts of 1904, section 10, gives the county court power to hear petitions for correction of error made by the reasessment commissioner in his valuation of land, and gives an appeal to the circuit court to both State and land owner; but it does not give an appeal or writ of error to this Court from the decision of the circuit court on such appeal. The statute for correction of annual assessment, Acts 1905, chapter.35, section 129, if it applies, gives the land owner an appeal from the county court to the circuit court, but not to the state. A writ of error is not given to this Court. I do not see any jurisdiction under those statutes for a writ of error. Mackin v. County Court, 38 W. Va. 338, 342, 347 . I cannot see any place for this writ of error under the general chapter relating to writs of error. Chapter 135, Code.
.1 do not discuss the question whether this matter is judicial, so as to warrant a writ of error, if given by statute, under principles found in the Mackin case, cited, and Town of Union Mines, 39 W. Va. 179 , and other cases. There is no writ of error given by statute in this matter.
We dismiss the writ of error for want of jurisdiction.
Dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.