TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. R. A. W.

State of West Virginia v. R. A. W.

State v. R. A. W., 267 S.E.2d 553 (W. Va. 1980)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
West Virginia Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 8, 1980
Docket
No. 14263
Citations
267 S.E.2d 553165 W. Va. 2641980 W. Va. LEXIS 536

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

After finding that R. A. W., the appellant, a juvenile, had participated in the grand larceny of a Ford Van, the Circuit Court of Logan County sentenced her to the Industrial School for Girls at Salem. On appeal she contends that there was insufficient evidence adduced at her trial to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that she was guilty of grand larceny. We disagree.

The evidence in this case shows that a Ford Van was stolen from Estelle Murray by two hitchhikers. Mr. Murray identified the appellant as one of the hitchhikers. When the van was located by the police, the appellant was found present in it, asleep. The appellant admitted that she was one of the two hitchhikers, and although she testified that her partner had actually driven the van away, her testimony indicated that she had assented to the act.

In Syllabus Point 3 of State v. Franklin, 139 W.Va. 43 , 79 S.E.2d 692 (1953), we said:

“A person who is present, aiding and abetting another in the commission of an offense, is a principal in the second degree within the meaning of Code, 61-11-1, which provides, in part: Tn the case of every felony, every principal in the second degree, and every accessory before the fact, shall be punishable as if he were the principal in the first degree.’ ”

After carefully examining the record we conclude that it shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant was present, aiding and abetting in the theft of the Ford Van.

The judgment of the Circuit Court of Logan County is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 11985: 119832026peak 1983 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Audia301 S.E.2d 199 (W. Va. 1983)
  2. State v. Wilson330 S.E.2d 450 (N.C. 1985)

Most recent

  1. State v. Wilson330 S.E.2d 450 (N.C. 1985)
  2. State v. Audia301 S.E.2d 199 (W. Va. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Franklin, 79 S.E.2d 692 (W. Va. 1953) 27

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list