TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Atlas Paper Co. v. Seamans

Atlas Paper Company v. Seamans, Receiver

Atlas Paper Co. v. Seamans, 52 N.W. 775 (Wis. 1892)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 15, 1892
Judges
Lyon
Citations
52 N.W. 77582 Wis. 5041892 Wisc. LEXIS 182
Summary
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Milwaukee County. cited the cases cited by the court in Dewey v. Davis, cmte, p. 500; also Doane v. Millville Ins. Go. 45 N. L Eq. 274; Taylor v. North Star M.. Ins. Go. 46 Minn. 198; White v. Havens, 20 ITow. Pr. 177, 181; State v. Monitor F. Asso. 42 Ohio St. 555.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Lyon

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Lyon, C. J.

This is a claim against the receiver of an insolvent mutual insurance company for an unearned premium, the policy having been determined by operation of law. The case is the same in principle as that of Dewey v. Davis, ante, p. 500. We hold in that case that premium notes in the hands of the receiver could not be assessed to pay unearned premiums. The ruling must be the same in this case. The superior court ordered the receiver to pay the claim out of the assets of the insolvent company, although such assets consisted entirely of premium notes. The order must be reversed, with directions to the superior court to disallow the claim.

By the Oourt.— Ordered accordingly.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 219452026peak 1945 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Wisconsin Mut. Ins. Co.19 N.W.2d 889 (Wis. 1945)
  2. Cheese Makers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Duel247 Wis. 485 (1945)

Most recent

  1. Cheese Makers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Duel247 Wis. 485 (1945)
  2. In re Wisconsin Mut. Ins. Co.19 N.W.2d 889 (Wis. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list