TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Winternitz v. Schmidt

Winternitz v. Schmidt, 154 N.W. 626 (Wis. 1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 26, 1915
Judges
Winslow
Citations
154 N.W. 626161 Wis. 4211915 Wisc. LEXIS 229
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Judgment on cognovit: Reopening case: Discretion: Appeal from civil court: Costs. 1. It was an abuse of discretion to refuse to reopen a case in which judgment had been entered on cognovit and permit defense to be made, where the moving papers included an answer setting forth a complete defense and showed that the judgment was suffered through “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” 2. The hearing of an appeal to the circuit court from the civil court of Milwaukee county is brought on by motion, and motion costs not exceeding $10 may be allowed thereon. 3. Under sec. 3069, Stats. 1913, as amended by sec. 9, ch. 219, Laws 1915, an order of the circuit court simply reversing an order of the civil court is not appealable.
Summary
Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: Oscae M. Ebitz, Circuit Judge. Judgment on cognovit having been entered in the civil court of Milwaukee county in this action, that court denied defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment and allow a defense to be interposed. On appeal to the circuit court this order was reversed with $10 costs, and the civil court was ordered to allow the proposed defense to be made on certain terms. From this latter order the plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Winslow

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Winslow, C. J.

The order of the circuit court must be affirmed. The moving papers in the civil court included an answer setting forth a complete" defense and affidavits showing that the judgment had been suffered through “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Under these circumstances it is an abuse of discretion to refuse to reopen *422 the case and allow the defense to be made. Sec. 2882, Stats.; Bloor v. Smith, 112 Wis. 340 , 87 N. W. 870 .

The court was entirely justified in imposing motion costs. Such costs, not exceeding $10, may be allowed on any motion. Sec. 2924, Stats. The hearing of an appeal from the civil court to the circuit court is brought on by motion. Sub. 4, sec. 28, ch. 549, Laws 1909.

Under the present statute regulating appeals to this court the order of the circuit court before us would not be appeal-able because it simply reverses an order of the civil court. Sec. 3069, Stats., as amended by sec. 9, ch. 219, Laws 1915.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1916: 11917: 119162026peak 1916 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Concrete Steel Co. v. Illinois Surety Co.157 N.W. 543 (Wis. 1916)
  2. Lemon v. Aronson164 N.W. 820 (Wis. 1917)

Most recent

  1. Lemon v. Aronson164 N.W. 820 (Wis. 1917)
  2. Concrete Steel Co. v. Illinois Surety Co.157 N.W. 543 (Wis. 1916)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Bloor v. Smith, 87 N.W. 870 (Wis. 1901) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list