Punches v. Schmidt
Punches v. Schmidt, and another
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The members of the court being equally divided on the question of whether the judgment and order should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice Beilfuss, Mr. Justice Hanley, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice HEFFERNAN, Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen, and Mr. Justice Day being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.