TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Disciplinary Action Against Romer

In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Nicholas Martin ROMER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 316337

In re Disciplinary Action Against Romer, 805 N.W.2d 14 (Minn. 2011)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 24, 2011
Docket
No. A11-1643
Judges
Alan
Citations
805 N.W.2d 142011 Minn. LEXIS 6692011 WL 5072009

Opinion of the Court — Alan

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Nicholas Martin Romer committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, failing to disclose on his 2001 application for admission without examination to the Minnesota bar: (1) civil .fraud penalties assessed against him by the Internal Revenue Service; (2) a finding by the United States Tax Court that respondent underreported his income for 1989, 1990, and 1991 with the fraudulent intent of evading taxes; and (3) certain civil litigation in which respondent was the plaintiff. Respondent has waived his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and admits the allegations of the petition. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Nicholas Martin Romer be, and the same is, publicly reprimanded. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list