TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Berry v. Silverman

ANNIE S. BERRY v. J. SILVERMAN

Berry v. Silverman, 173 S.W. 101 (Mo. Ct. App. 1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 2, 1915
Judges
Allen, Fulc, Lsyr, Nortoni
Citations
173 S.W. 101187 Mo. App. 6781915 Mo. App. LEXIS 320
Disposition
Aeeirmed.
Summary
Appeal from St. Louis County Circuit Court. — lion. John W. McElhimtey, Judge.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Nortoni

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

NORTONI, J.

The question in judgment in this case is identical with that involved in the case of Berry v. McConnell, ante, p. 673, 173 S. W. 100 (decided today).

*679 By stipulation of tlie parties, the case was submitted on the same abstracts and briefs and it is to abide the judgment in the casé above referred to.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed on the authority of Berry v. McConnell, supra. It is so ordered.

Lsyr.fulc, P. J., and Allen, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Berry v. McConnell, 173 S.W. 100 (Mo. Ct. App. 1915) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list