TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Upper v. Green

Joseph Upper, and Ashbel Green, receiver &c.

Upper v. Green, 40 N.J. Eq. 340 (1885)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 15, 1885
Judges
Affirmance, Brown, Clement, Cole, Depue, Dixon, Magie, McGregor, Paterson, Reed, Reversal, Scudder, Syokel, Whitake
Citations
40 N.J. Eq. 340
Summary
On appeal from a decree of the chancellor, whose opinion is reported in North River Construction Co.’s Case, 11 Stew. Eq. 433.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

This decree affirmed for the reasons given by the chancellor.

*341 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syokel, Brown, Cole, McGregor, Whitake® — 10. For reversal — Dixon, Clement, Paterson — 3.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 11937: 11941: 11948: 11970: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Camden Co. Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co.62 A.2d 416 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1948)
  2. Schmid v. First Camden National Bank, C., Co.22 A.2d 246 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1941)
  3. BD. OF ED. OF BAYONNE v. Kolman270 A.2d 64 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1970)
  4. Minton v. Sutton135 A. 693 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1927)
  5. Withers v. D'Auria Bank Trust Co.195 A. 298 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1937)

Most recent

  1. BD. OF ED. OF BAYONNE v. Kolman270 A.2d 64 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1970)
  2. Camden Co. Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co.62 A.2d 416 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1948)
  3. Schmid v. First Camden National Bank, C., Co.22 A.2d 246 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1941)
  4. Withers v. D'Auria Bank Trust Co.195 A. 298 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1937)
  5. Minton v. Sutton135 A. 693 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list