State ex rel. Board of Health v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen
The State, ex rel. Board of Health of Hackensack v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Bergen
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This court agrees with his Honor, the vice-chancellor, that the complainant has failed to establish by his testimony the existence of a nuisance, and the decree is consequently affirmed.
The other matters discussed in the opinion in the court of chancery have not been considered by this court.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiep-Justice, Depue, Diícon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Smith, Whitaker — 11.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.