Fritts v. Turner
Virginia A. Fritts v. Isaac H. Turner
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
No opinion was rendered. An order was entered reciting that the court were of opinion that the decrees of the orphans court and the prerogative court should be reversed for the want of a full and proper hearing in said courts below, and adjudging that the decree of the orphans court admitting the paper, purporting to be the will of Thomas H. Turner, to probate as his last will and testament, together with the decree of the prerogative court affirming the same, be reversed with costs, and leave was given to the appellant to cross-examine the proponent in the prerogative court on the whole case, and to testify to the same extent, and that both sides recall the witnesses for re-examination or cross-examination, and that new testimony might be put in.
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Meets, Bogert, Krueger, Smith — 10.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.