TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wyckoff v. Wyckoff

Elizabeth Wyckoff v. Ellen Wyckoff

Wyckoff v. Wyckoff, 49 N.J. Eq. 344 (1892)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1892
Citations
49 N.J. Eq. 344
Headnotes
1. A devise of land, “ to be valued at §90 per aere,” amounts merely to-giving to the devisee the option of purchasing from the residuary beneficiaries-at the price named. 2. Testator devised certain tracts of land to his sons and son-in-law, “ to be valued at $90 an acre.” He then directed that his executors, who were the-three devisees, should each pay an annuity of $70 to the widow in lieu of dower. — I-Ield, that the devisees took the land charged with the annuity. 3. The charge on the land in such case is not affected by the fact that sufficient personal estate was left to pay the annuity.
Summary
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney on a bill filed for the construction of the will of John M. Wyckoff, deceased, and for a decree charging the lands, of which he died seized, with the payment of an annuity to his widow, the respondent, bequeathed to her by his will.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-chancellor.

For affirmance — Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Reed, Scudder, Bogert, Clement, Smith, Whitaker — 9.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Magie, Van Syckel, Brown — 4.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 11954: 119452026peak 1945 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Arenofsky v. Arenofsky102 A.2d 101 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
  2. D'Arcangelo v. D'Arcangelo43 A.2d 169 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)

Most recent

  1. Arenofsky v. Arenofsky102 A.2d 101 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
  2. D'Arcangelo v. D'Arcangelo43 A.2d 169 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list