Slockbower v. Kanouse
Maria Slockbower v. Alexander Kanouse
Slockbower v. Kanouse, 49 N.J. Eq. 592 (1892)
Headnotes
A bill for partition will not be sustained where the complainant’s legal title is in dispute; but the bill may be retained to afford the party an opportunity of settling his title at law, or it may be dismissed.
Summary
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, whose opinion is reported in Kanouse v. Slockbower, 3 Dick. Ch. Rep. 42.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Decree reversed on the ground that the title was in dispute.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Krueger, Smith — 11.
For affirmance — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.