TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Starkey v. Fox

Thomas Starkey v. Elizabeth Fox

Starkey v. Fox, 53 N.J. Eq. 239 (1895)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1895
Citations
53 N.J. Eq. 239
Summary
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Green, whose opinion is reported in Starkey v. Fox, 7 Dick. Ch. Rep. 758.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Dix'on, Gummere, Lippincott, Magie, Eeed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Krueger, Sims — 10.

For reversal — Hone.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11939: 119362026peak 1936 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Phair v. Melosh6 A.2d 491 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1939)
  2. Clark v. Freeman188 A. 493 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1936)

Most recent

  1. Phair v. Melosh6 A.2d 491 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1939)
  2. Clark v. Freeman188 A. 493 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list