Potter v. Ashhurst
Thomas F. Potter v. Elizabeth Ashhurst
Potter v. Ashhurst, 54 N.J. Eq. 699 (1896)
Summary
On appeal from a decree advised by Yice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in Ashhurst v. Potter, 8 Dick. Ch. Pep. 608.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Yan Syckel, Barkalow, Bogert, Nixon — 12.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.