TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bridgewater v. Ocean City Railroad

William Bridgewater, and v. The Ocean City Railroad Company, and

Bridgewater v. Ocean City R.R., 52 A. 1130 (N.J. 1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 23, 1902
Judges
Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Dixon, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Krueger, Pitney, Port, Reversal, Syckel, Voorhees, Yredenburgh, Yroom
Citations
52 A. 113063 N.J. Eq. 79818 Dickinson 7981902 N.J. LEXIS 187

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey filed in the court below. See 17 DicTc. Oh. Rep. 276.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Yredenburgh, Voorhees—13. For reversal—Hendrickson, Yroom—2.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 11927: 11930: 11931: 11943: 11954: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.31 A.2d 190 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1943)
  2. Rossi v. Sierchio105 A.2d 687 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
  3. Radey v. Parr153 A. 628 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1931)
  4. Pound v. Pleister150 A. 58 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1930)
  5. Derossett v. Bianchi136 A. 301 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1927)
  6. Durham Essex Corp. v. Schaffer133 A. 754 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1926)

Most recent

  1. Rossi v. Sierchio105 A.2d 687 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
  2. Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.31 A.2d 190 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1943)
  3. Radey v. Parr153 A. 628 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1931)
  4. Pound v. Pleister150 A. 58 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1930)
  5. Derossett v. Bianchi136 A. 301 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1927)
  6. Durham Essex Corp. v. Schaffer133 A. 754 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list