TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Freund v. Freund

Mary Freund v. Michael Freund

Freund v. Freund, 73 A. 1117 (N.J. 1907)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 17, 1907
Judges
Affirmance, Bogert, Chiee, Dbnburgh, Dlll, Fort, Garrison, Gray, Green, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Vre, Vroom
Citations
73 A. 111772 N.J. Eq. 9432 Buchanan 9431907 N.J. LEXIS 330
Cited by 5
Summary
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 71 N. J. Eq. (1 Buch.) 524-

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court below.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vre-DBNBURGH, VROOM, GREEN, GRAY, DlLL—14. For reversal—None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1926: 11927: 11930: 11948: 11953: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Reik v. Reik139 A. 385 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1927)
  2. Baumgarten v. Baumgarten151 A. 606 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1930)
  3. Miele v. Miele95 A.2d 768 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
  4. Fried v. Fried99 N.J. Eq. 106 (1926)
  5. Payne v. Payne63 A.2d 549 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1948)

Most recent

  1. Miele v. Miele95 A.2d 768 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
  2. Payne v. Payne63 A.2d 549 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1948)
  3. Baumgarten v. Baumgarten151 A. 606 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1930)
  4. Reik v. Reik139 A. 385 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1927)
  5. Fried v. Fried99 N.J. Eq. 106 (1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list