Atlantic City Gas & Water Co. v. Consumers Gas & Fuel Co.
Atlantic City Gas and Water Company, complainant-appellant v. Consumers Gas and Fuel Company, defendants-respondents
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This was an injunction bill. An application for a prelinrinary injunction was heard by Vice-Chancellor Bergen, who denied it for reasons expressed by him .in an opinion reported in 70 N. J. Eq. (4 Robb.) 536. The cause was afterward^ submitted’ on final hearing to Vice-Chancellor Learning upon the same testimony. He concurred in the views. of Vice-Chancellor Bergen, and advised the dismissal of the bill of complaint.
We likewise concur, and the decree of dismissal should be affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, 'Trenchard, Parker, Bogert, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill — 11. For reversal — None.
*457 CASES ADJUDGED IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ' MAY TERM, 1908.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.