Kelsey v. Dilks
Mary E. Kelsey v. Sarah Dilks
Kelsey v. Dilks, 79 A. 686 (N.J. 1910)
Summary
On appeal from a decree in the court of chancery advised by Yiee-Chaneellor Learning, whose opinion “is reported in 74 N. J. Eq. (4 Buch.) 270.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
■ For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Ykoom, Gray, Dill, Congdon — 14.
For reversal — Hone.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.