Kayhart v. Whitehead

Edward Kayhart, &c., of Wilbur Kayhart v. Adeline Whitehead

Kayhart v. Whitehead, 81 A. 1133 (N.J. 1911)

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided: June 19, 1911
Judges: Affirmance, Bergen, Chiee, Congdon, Garrison, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchakd, Voorhees, Vredenburgh
Citations: 81 A. 113378 N.J. Eq. 5808 Buchanan 5801911 N.J. LEXIS 297

Cited by 5 1 descriptions by later courts

Summary

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 77 N. J. Eq. (7 Buch.) 12.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons statod in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, -Voorhees, Minturn, Vredenburgh, Congdon — 10. For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(violation of in terrorem clause where beneficiary testified in will contest, aided [contestant] in securing witnesses, entered into written agreement with caveator, and filed appearance, becoming party)

In re THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. McLOUGHLIN., No. 23-P-770 (Mass. App. Ct. Sept. 30, 2024)

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Rudd v. Searles160 N.E. 882 (Mass. 1928)
In re Caruso112 A.2d 532 (N.J. 1955)
In re Bender192 A. 718 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1937)
In re Story138 A. 199 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1927)
In re THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. McLOUGHLIN.No. 23-P-770 (Mass. App. Ct. Sept. 30, 2024)

Most recent

In re THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. McLOUGHLIN.No. 23-P-770 (Mass. App. Ct. Sept. 30, 2024)
In re Caruso112 A.2d 532 (N.J. 1955)
In re Bender192 A. 718 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1937)
Rudd v. Searles160 N.E. 882 (Mass. 1928)
In re Story138 A. 199 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list