TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Tuttle v. Harris

William E. Tuttle v. Benjamin S. Harris

Tuttle v. Harris, 92 A. 596 (N.J. 1914)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 16, 1914
Citations
92 A. 59683 N.J. Eq. 6661914 N.J. LEXIS 395
Cited by 3

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swanze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Heppenheimer, Williams — 13.

For reversal — Fone.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →
1934: 11941: 11965: 119342026peak 1934 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mid-West Engineering & Construction Co. v. Campagna397 S.W.2d 616 (Mo. 1965)
  2. Rouse v. Pollard18 A.2d 5 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1941)
  3. Tipula v. Garfield Mill, Inc.170 A. 228 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1934)

Most recent

  1. Mid-West Engineering & Construction Co. v. Campagna397 S.W.2d 616 (Mo. 1965)
  2. Rouse v. Pollard18 A.2d 5 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1941)
  3. Tipula v. Garfield Mill, Inc.170 A. 228 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1934)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list