TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. Crucible Steel Co. of America

United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Company v. Crucible Steel Company of America

United N.J. R.R. & Canal Co. v. Crucible Steel Co. of Am., 98 A. 1087 (N.J. 1916)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 19, 1916
Citations
98 A. 108786 N.J. Eq. 2581 Stock. 2581916 N.J. LEXIS 456
Summary
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 86 N. J. Eq. 7.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenoiiard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis oh, Black, White, Terhunb, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 15.

For reversal — Hone.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 11950: 11954: 11957: 119352026peak 1935 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hyland v. Fonda129 A.2d 899 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  2. Ingling v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.76 A.2d 76 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  3. WARREN FOUNDRY AND PIPE CORP v. Meriden Stone Co.108 A.2d 192 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
  4. Hercules Trust Estate v. Gauzzi177 A. 99 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1935)

Most recent

  1. Hyland v. Fonda129 A.2d 899 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  2. WARREN FOUNDRY AND PIPE CORP v. Meriden Stone Co.108 A.2d 192 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
  3. Ingling v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.76 A.2d 76 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  4. Hercules Trust Estate v. Gauzzi177 A. 99 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list