In re the Will of Whitehead
In the matter of the will of Whitehead
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The decree of the court below is affirmed, for the reasons stated in that court by Vice-Ordinary Learning. We ought to say, however,' that the illustration-as to legislative limitations upon the certiorari power involves considerations that are quite aside from the matter in hand, and that may give rise to implications that would be misleading.
By pointing out that our concurrence does not extend to such implications, we shall avoid any possible misconception on this head.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 12.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.