TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Provident Institution for Saving v. Mead

Provident Institution for Saving in Jersey City v. Benjamin C. Mead, &c.

Provident Inst. for Saving v. Mead, 102 A. 1053 (N.J. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 11, 1917
Judges
Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Heprenheimer, Kalisch, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenchard, White, Williams
Citations
102 A. 105388 N.J. Eq. 3493 Stock. 3491917 N.J. LEXIS 496
Cited by 4
Summary
Appeal of the Sisters of the Poor of St. Francis. On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson, whose opinion is reported in 87 N. J. Eq. 424.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

*350 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heprenheimer, Williams, Taylor — 11. For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →
1932: 11944: 11947: 11953: 119322026peak 1932 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Heise v. Earle35 A.2d 880 (N.J. 1944)
  2. In re Taylor100 A.2d 346 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
  3. Straut v. Hollinger50 A.2d 478 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1947)
  4. Burnham v. Town of Templeton182 N.E. 822 (Mass. 1932)

Most recent

  1. In re Taylor100 A.2d 346 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
  2. Straut v. Hollinger50 A.2d 478 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1947)
  3. Heise v. Earle35 A.2d 880 (N.J. 1944)
  4. Burnham v. Town of Templeton182 N.E. 822 (Mass. 1932)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list