TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Riley v. Ocean City Ass'n

Mart A. T. Riley v. Ocean City Association

Riley v. Ocean City Ass'n, 102 A. 1053 (N.J. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 11, 1917
Judges
Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Heppenheimer, Kalisch, Minturn, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, White, Williams
Citations
102 A. 105388 N.J. Eq. 3523 Stock. 3521917 N.J. LEXIS 495
Cited by 4
Summary
Appeal of the Atlantic Land Development Company. On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baekes, whose opinion is reported in 85 N. J. Eq. 379.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 9. For reversal — Parker, Bergen, Minturn — 3.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →
1934: 11941: 11945: 11993: 119342026peak 1934 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Harbuck73 S.W.2d 113 (Tex. App. 1934)
  2. Giles v. W. E. Beverage Corp.43 A.2d 286 (N.J. 1945)
  3. Quigley, Inc. v. Miller Family Farms629 A.2d 110 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993)
  4. Staubach v. Cities Service Oil Co.19 A.2d 882 (N.J. 1941)

Most recent

  1. Quigley, Inc. v. Miller Family Farms629 A.2d 110 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993)
  2. Giles v. W. E. Beverage Corp.43 A.2d 286 (N.J. 1945)
  3. Staubach v. Cities Service Oil Co.19 A.2d 882 (N.J. 1941)
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Harbuck73 S.W.2d 113 (Tex. App. 1934)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list