Kelly v. Chinich
William A. Kelly, complainants-respondents v. Barnet Chinich
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This case was marked to be submitted on briefs, and briefs came in on both sides. That for the appellants, however, is not signed by counsel, and cannot be considered. The case stands as though the appeal had not been moved, and respondents are consequently entitled to a decree of affirmance. Hazard v, Phœnix Woodworking Co., 78 N. J. Eq. 568.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER-13.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.