TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Maas & Waldstein Co. v. Walker

Maas & Waldstein Company v. Henry V. Walker

Maas & Waldstein Co. v. Walker, 140 A. 921 (N.J. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 6, 1928
Judges
Cueiam
Citations
140 A. 921102 N.J. Eq. 3281928 N.J. LEXIS 596

Opinion of the Court — Cueiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 224.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1940: 119402026peak 1940 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Haut v. Rossbach15 A.2d 227 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1940)

Most recent

  1. Haut v. Rossbach15 A.2d 227 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1940)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Maas Waldstein Co. v. Walker, 135 A. 275 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1926) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list