Union District School Trustees v. State ex rel. Pierce
UNION DISTRICT SCHOOL TRUSTEES, IN ERROR v. STATE, EX REL. PIERCE, IN ERROR
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The Chancellor.
I am of opinion that the judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Reed, Scudder, "Van Syckel, Cole, Mc-Gregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 10.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.