Farrier v. State ex rel. Dugan
GEORGE H. FARRIER, IN ERROR v. THE STATE EX REL., HUGH DUGAN, IN ERROR
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme' Court in its opinion.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Depue, Knapp, •Scudder, Brown, Clement, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 9.
For reversal—None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.