TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Leeds v. Camden & Atlantic Railroad

CHARLES E. LEEDS, IN ERROR v. CAMDEN AND ATLANTIC RAILROAD, IN ERROR

Leeds v. Camden & Atl. R.R., 23 A. 169 (N.J. 1890)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 15, 1890
Citations
23 A. 16953 N.J.L. 23324 Vroom 2331890 N.J. LEXIS 4
Summary
Error to Atlantic Circuit.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The same question as above decided is presented in this case, and a similar judgment will be given for reversal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1905: 119052026peak 1905 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Paul v. Salt Lake City Ry. Co.83 P. 563 (Utah 1905)

Most recent

  1. Paul v. Salt Lake City Ry. Co.83 P. 563 (Utah 1905)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list