State v. Segoine
THE STATE, CHARLES W. MAXSON, PROSECUTORS, IN ERROR v. WILLIAM SEGOINE, IN ERROR
State v. Segoine, 25 A. 963 (N.J. 1891)
Summary
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 24 Vroom 339.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
*213 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Magie, Reed, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 10.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.