Exton v. Central Railroad
JOSEPH H. EXTON AND FANNY P. EXTON, HIS WIFE, IN ERROR v. THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, IN ERROR
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this ease is affirmed upon the opinion in the. Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Collins, Dixon, Garrison, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh. 11.
For reversal — 'None.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that defendant owed a duty to take reasonable precautions to protect its passengers from injury caused by recurrent scuffling by cabmen in the walkway of its railroad depot)
-
(finding carrier liable because of knowledge of criminal propensities of men loitering around station)
-
(liability of carrier for injury to passenger on passageway caused by scuffling of hackmen)
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.