TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Exton v. Central Railroad

JOSEPH H. EXTON AND FANNY P. EXTON, HIS WIFE, IN ERROR v. THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, IN ERROR

Exton v. Cent. R.R., 46 A. 1099 (N.J. 1899)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 19, 1899
Citations
46 A. 109963 N.J.L. 35634 Vroom 3561899 N.J. LEXIS 82
Summary
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 33 Vroom 7.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease is affirmed upon the opinion in the. Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Collins, Dixon, Garrison, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh. 11.

For reversal — 'None.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1907: 11908: 11911: 21937: 11952: 11955: 11962: 11964: 11975: 21976: 11993: 11997: 219072026peak 1911 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of Newark186 A.2d 291 (N.J. 1962)
  2. Lieberman v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW JERSEY622 A.2d 1295 (N.J. 1993)
  3. Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.694 A.2d 1017 (N.J. 1997)
  4. Tormo v. Yormark398 F. Supp. 1159 (D.N.J. 1975)
  5. Atamian v. Supermarkets General Corp.369 A.2d 38 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
  6. Mayer v. Housing Auth. of Jersey City202 A.2d 439 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.694 A.2d 1017 (N.J. 1997)
  2. Gingeleskie v. Westin Hotel Co.961 F. Supp. 1310 (D. Ariz. 1997)
  3. Lieberman v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW JERSEY622 A.2d 1295 (N.J. 1993)
  4. Atamian v. Supermarkets General Corp.369 A.2d 38 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
  5. Tormo v. Yormark398 F. Supp. 1159 (D.N.J. 1975)
  6. Smith v. West Suburban Transit Lines, Inc.326 N.E.2d 449 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list