Stokes v. Schlacter
EDWARD H. STOKES, TREASURER, &c., IN ERROR v. GEORGE SCHLACTER, IN ERROR
Headnotes
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The plaintiff in error obtained, in this court, not only a reversal of the judgment of the Supreme Court, but also an affirmance of the original judgment in the trial court, thus finally ending the litigation in his favor. He is, therefore, entitled to costs in this court.
The cause having been brought into the Supreme Court by certiorari, the question of costs there is, by statute, committed to the discretion of that court, and consequently application must be there made for costs in certiorari.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.