TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sonn v. Erie Railroad

EMMA R. SONN, IN ERROR v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, IN ERROR

Sonn v. Erie R.R., 51 A. 1109 (N.J. 1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 3, 1902
Judges
Pee
Citations
51 A. 110967 N.J.L. 35038 Vroom 3501902 N.J. LEXIS 114
Summary
On error to the Supreme Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Pee

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Collins. 37 Vroom 428 .

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Sonn v. Erie R.R., 49 A. 458 (N.J. 1901) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list