Alcutt v. Board of Police Commissioners
WILLIAM ALCUTT, IN ERROR v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, IN ERROR
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Garretson. 37 Vroom 173 .
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Collins, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 12.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.