Snyder v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
HIRAM SNYDER AND WILLIAM H. HENDRICKSON, PARTNERS, &c., DEPENDANTS IN ERROR v. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, IN ERROR
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The questions raised in this ease are the same as those raised in Gardner & Meeks Company v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, decided by this court at the present term (ante ¶. 257). The judgment under review herein will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Pitney in that case.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray. 13. For reversal — -None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.