TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Lee

THE STATE, IN ERROR v. URIAH S. LEE, IN ERROR

State v. Lee, 59 A. 1118 (N.J. 1905)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 20, 1905
Citations
59 A. 111874 N.J.L. 85245 Vroom 8521905 N.J. LEXIS 131

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error must be affirmed, on the grounds stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon in the Supreme Court, reported in 41 Vroom 368.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Yoori-iees, Yroom, Gray’, J.J. 11.

For reversal — Done.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 119682026peak 1968 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. SMITH246 A.2d 35 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)

Most recent

  1. State v. SMITH246 A.2d 35 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Lee, 57 A. 142 (N.J. 1904) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list