Savage v. Stover
ALBERT E. SAVAGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. EDWARD STOVER
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review in this case will be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court in its opinion, except as to the observation, to the effect that in law there can he no identity as between an individual and a corporation. Upon the proposition thus generally stated we express no opinion.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chtee Justice, Garrison, Trench ard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Yredenburgit, White, Teritune, Heppenkeimer, Williams, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.