Orpen v. Watson
J. FREDERICK ORPEN v. JOHN WATSON
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
For the reasons stated in our opinion in Devlin v. Wilson (ante p. 180), delivered at the present term, the judgment under review will be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, SWAY'ZE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MlNTURN, KALISCH, Black, Yredenburgi-i, White, Terhune, Williams, Taylor, J J. 14.
For reversal—None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.