D'Aloia v. City of Summit
J. VICTOR D'ALOIA v. CITY OF SUMMIT
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
We think the payment was voluntary. The present plaintiff had the option to pay or appeal. He chose to pay. He cannot recover back the money. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief • Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Mintuen, Kalisoh, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 10.
For reversal—None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.