TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Curtis v. Joyce

HOWARD CURTIS v. CHARLES E. JOYCE

Curtis v. Joyce, 102 A. 1053 (N.J. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 31, 1918
Judges
Cubiam
Citations
102 A. 105391 N.J.L. 6851918 N.J. LEXIS 207
Summary
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. L. 47.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cubiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list