State v. Marriner
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, IN ERROR v. BERTRAM MARRINER, IN ERROR
State v. Marriner, 111 A. 688 (N.J. 1920)
Summary
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. L. 273.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CueiaM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Swayze, TeeNohaed, Paeiíee, BeegeN, Kalisoh, White, HeppeNheiMee, WiluiaMs, Tayloe, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.