Charney v. Cohen
ZELDA CHARNEY, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., OF ISIDORE CHARNEY v. JACOB COHEN
Charney v. Cohen, 112 A. 893 (N.J. 1921)
Summary
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 94 N. J. L. 381.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Pee Cuejam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the-Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchard, PARKER, Bergen, Kaliscit, KatzeNBAoh, White, Heppen-HEIMER, WILLIAMS,’ TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.