Hulme v. Donnelly

FREDERIC L. HULME v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON

Hulme v. Donnelly, 112 A. 498 (N.J. 1921)

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided: February 28, 1921
Judges: Affirmance, Aokbrson, Bergen, Chancedlor, Cueiajvl, Gardner, Heppüntieimer, Justioe, Kadiscií, Kat, Mlntürn, None, Parker, Reversal, Taylor, Trexcirard, White, Williams, Zenbacu
Citations: 112 A. 49895 N.J.L. 5451921 N.J. LEXIS 148

Cited by 0

Summary

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. L. 30.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cueiajvl

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Cueiajvl

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNCedloR, Chief Justioe, TREXCirARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTÜRN, KaDISCIÍ, KaT-zeNBACU, White, HeppüNTIeimer, WilliaMS, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKBRSON, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list