TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kowalski v. Hines

ANTHONY KOWALSKI v. WALKER D. HINES, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS

Kowalski v. Hines, 114 A. 927 (N.J. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 20, 1921
Judges
Fee
Citations
114 A. 92796 N.J.L. 2931921 N.J. LEXIS 185
Summary
On appeal hom the Supreme Court, whose opinion is re ported in 93 K. J. L. 340.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Fee

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Fee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliscli in the Mupreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Cujee Justice, Hwayze, Trench aed, Parker, Minturn. Kaxzhnbacti, HeppenniiTirer, Wirliams, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For ¡eveisal—"White, J. 1.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list