TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Combination Manufacturing Co. v. Court of Common Pleas

THE COMBINATION MANUFACTURING COMPANY, A CORPORATION v. THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ESSEX, AND JOHN H. SCOTT, CLERK OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, AND RICHARD OBSER

Combination Mfg. Co. v. Court of Common Pleas, 115 A. 139 (N.J. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 23, 1921
Citations
115 A. 13996 N.J.L. 5441921 N.J. LEXIS 217
Summary
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. L. 43.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—■ Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Heppeniiftmer, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 9.

For reversal—None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 11960: 11965: 11983: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ratsch v. Holderman158 A.2d 24 (N.J. 1960)
  2. Killisnoo Packing Co. v. Scott14 F.2d 86 (9th Cir. 1926)
  3. Employers' Fire Insurance v. Taxation Division Director5 N.J. Tax 326 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1983)
  4. Belth v. Anthony Ferrante & Son, Inc.210 A.2d 430 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1965)

Most recent

  1. Employers' Fire Insurance v. Taxation Division Director5 N.J. Tax 326 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1983)
  2. Belth v. Anthony Ferrante & Son, Inc.210 A.2d 430 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1965)
  3. Ratsch v. Holderman158 A.2d 24 (N.J. 1960)
  4. Killisnoo Packing Co. v. Scott14 F.2d 86 (9th Cir. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list